Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084070›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025

Improved estimation of intrinsic solubility of drug-like molecules through multi-task graph transformer.

Jiaxi Zhao, Eline Hermans, Kia Sepassi, Christophe Tistaert, Christel A S Bergström, Mazen Ahmad, Per Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Data-Driven Critical Evaluation of the General Solubility Equation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiaxi ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eline HermansPharmaceutical & Material Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Kia SepassiDiscovery Pharmaceutics, Johnson & Johnson, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Christophe TistaertPharmaceutical & Material Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Christel A S BergströmDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mazen AhmadIn-Silico Discovery, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Per LarssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. per.r.larsson@uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aqueous solubility of a compound plays a crucial role throughout various stages of drug discovery and development. Despite numerous efforts using various machine learning models, accurately estimating aqueous solubility remains a challenge. One primary limitation is the absence of a single source, large dataset of druglike compounds for model training. Additionally, studies have highlighted the need for improvements in prediction algorithms and molecular representations. To address these challenges, the Johnson and Johnson (J&J) in-house solubility data was leveraged. Theoretical pH-solubility equations and in-house pKa prediction tools were utilized to calculate intrinsic solubility from J&J data. A multi-task graph transformer model was developed and trained on the calculated intrinsic solubility data of 13,306 compounds along with seven relevant physicochemical properties including solubility at pH 2/7, logP, and logD at three different pHs. When evaluated making use of high-quality test data, the developed model achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.61 and coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

Drug-like compoundsGraph transformerMolecular property predictionMuti-task learningQuantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR)

Identifiers

PMID41084070
PMCPMC12516829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.