ArticleJournal of neuroinflammation2025
Assessment of intestinal barrier integrity and associations with innate immune activation and metabolic syndrome in acutely ill, antipsychotic-free schizophrenia patients.
Article in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchizophrenia (Sz), once seen solely as a brain disorder, is now recognised as a systemic illness involving immune and metabolic dysregulation. The intestinal barrier has emerged as a key player in gut-brain-immune interactions. However, studies in early, antipsychotic free stages remain scarce and often neglect confounding factors such as smoking and metabolic syndrome.
methodsWe measured two complementary markers: lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), reflecting endotoxin exposure and systemic immune activation, and intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), indicating gut epithelial damage and permeability changes, in blood from 96 acutely ill, antipsychotic-free Sz patients (61 first-episode, 35 relapsed) and 96 matched controls. Associations with innate immunity, metabolic parameters, smoking, and clinical features were assessed using nonparametric statistics and random forest regression. Group differences were tested using covariate adjustment, as well as in a separate analysis of non-smokers (Sz: n = 42; controls: n = 84).
resultsMedian LBP was higher in Sz (21.96 µg/mL) vs. controls (18.10 µg/mL; FDR-adjusted p = 0.021, δ = 0.209) but became non-significant after adjusting for smoking (FDR-adjusted p = 0.199). In contrast, I-FABP was lower in Sz (218.2 pg/mL) than controls (315.0 pg/mL; FDR-adjusted p = 0.021, δ = -0.195) and remained robust across smoking-adjusted analyses. No differences were found between first-episode and relapsed patients for either marker. LBP correlated strongly with CRP (r = 0.557, p < 0.001) and neutrophils (r = 0.468, p < 0.001) and was moderately predicted by immune models (pseudo-R
conclusionsOur findings suggest separable gut‑related processes in antipsychotic-free Sz. The apparent LBP elevation was not schizophrenia‑specific; its strong correlations with CRP and neutrophils point to smoking related inflammation rather than a schizophrenia specific effect. Accordingly, prior findings of LBP elevations in Sz likely reflect unaccounted smoking. In contrast, reduced I-FABP, independent of smoking, may indicate epithelial injury. The absent correlation between LBP and I-FABP highlights distinct pathophysiological dimensions of gut dysfunction. Longitudinal studies, ideally spanning prodromal phases and integrating microbiome, dietary, smoking, and permeability assessments, are needed to clarify temporal dynamics and guide stratified treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.