Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41084038›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2025

Pathological and bacteriological findings in sows, finisher pigs, and piglets, being culled for lameness.

Magdalena Jacobson, Mika Berglund, Michelle Pettersson, Magdalena Sandström, Frida Matti, Marie Sjölund, Annette Backhans, Bjørnar Ytrehus, Stina Ekman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Magdalena JacobsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden. magdalena.jacobson@slu.se.
Mika BerglundDistriktsveterinärerna Rimbo, Rimbo, Sweden.
Michelle PetterssonDistriktsveterinärerna Nerike, Lindesberg, Sweden.
Magdalena SandströmBjörkhyttan Stora Heleneberg 150, Lindesberg, Sweden.
Frida MattiFarm and Animal Health, Kungsängens Gård, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marie SjölundSwedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Annette BackhansSwedish Veterinary Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bjørnar YtrehusNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway.
Stina EkmanSection for Pathology, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLameness is a common pig disorder. In the herd, a recurring, consistent aetiology is often suspected based on the age of the pig and herd-specific predisposing factors. The aetiology may be difficult to establish especially in larger animals, since the primary pathogenesis is obscured by delayed diagnosis, chronic changes and sequelae, and thorough investigation usually requires culling and transport to a pathological laboratory for necropsy. Thus, treatments are mostly based on a tentative diagnosis, commonly including antibiotics to eliminate infectious agents. The study aimed to investigate the aetiology of lameness in various age-categories of pigs, compare the tentative clinical diagnosis with post mortem findings, and discuss the findings in relation to the adequacy of antibiotic treatment.

resultsIn total, 29 sows, 45 finisher pigs, and 130 suckling piglets diagnosed with lameness were included. In all age categories, arthritis was the most common finding (13 sows, 30 finisher pigs, and 126 piglets, i.e. 45, 67, and 97% of the respective category). 86% (n = 25) of the sows and 71% (n = 32) of the finisher pigs had been treated with antibiotics. Of the post mortal lesions assessed to have an infectious aetiology, 99% were interpreted as chronic and eight sows, two finisher pigs and one suckling piglet had fractures. In six samples from finisher pigs, the most common finding was beta-haemolytic streptococci. In the suckling pigs, 223 samples from affected joints and 37 samples from macroscopically unaffected joints were subject to cultivation. The most commonly found bacterial species were S. hyicus (n = 73 isolates) and S. dysgalactiae ssp. equisimilis (n = 58). 46 of 64 S. hyicus-isolates tested were resistant to penicillin, whereas all 44 isolates of S. dysgalactiae ssp. equisimilis tested were sensitive to penicillin.

conclusionIn the majority of the cases, the findings at necropsy confirmed the clinical diagnosis. However, the rationale for antibiotic treatment must be questioned since 21 of 57 sows and finisher pigs (37%) treated with antibiotics were shown to suffer from lameness inflicted by non-infectious causes post mortem. Further, in all sows and finisher pigs, and in 83% (n = 104) of the suckling pigs with lesions being assessed to have an infectious aetiology at necropsy, the lesions were interpreted as being chronic. In piglets, S. dysgalactiae ssp. equisimilis or S. hyicus were isolated in 64% of the samples. A majority of these isolates were susceptible to penicillin, still rendering this a valid drug for treatment in acute cases of arthritis.

Indexed as

AbrasionsAntimicrobial susceptibilityArthritisPost mortem examinationUmbilical abscesses

Identifiers

PMID41084038
PMCPMC12516889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.