Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083982›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

GPT-4o and the quest for machine learning interpretability in ICU risk of death prediction.

Moein E Samadi, Kateryna Nikulina, Sebastian Johannes Fritsch, Andreas Schuppert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moein E SamadiInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3916-1085
Kateryna NikulinaInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Sebastian Johannes FritschDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8350-8584
Andreas SchuppertInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. aschuppert@ukaachen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3783-6605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical utilization of machine learning is hampered by the lack of interpretability inherent in most non-linear black box modeling approaches, reducing trust among clinicians and regulators. Advanced large language models offer a potential framework for integrating medical knowledge into these models, potentially enhancing their interpretability.

methodsA hybrid mechanistic/data-driven modeling framework is presented for developing an ICU risk of death prediction model for mechanically ventilated patients. In the mechanistic modeling part, GPT-4o is used to generate detailed medical feature descriptions, which are then aggregated into a comprehensive corpus and processed with TF-I DF vectorization. Fuzzy C-means clustering is subsequently applied to these vectorized features to identify significant mortality cause-specific feature clusters, and a physician reviewed the resulting clusters to validate their relevance to actionable insights for clinical decision support. In the data-driven part, the identified clusters inform the creation of XGBoost-based weak classifiers, whose outcomes are combined into a single XGBoost-based strong classifier through a hierarchically structured feed-forward network. This process results in a novel GPT hybrid model for ICU risk of death prediction.

resultsThis study enrolled 16,018 mechanically ventilated ICU patients, divided into derivation (12,758) and validation (3,260) cohorts, to develop and evaluate a GPT hybrid model for predicting in-ICU death. Leveraging GPT-4o, we implemented an automated process for clustering mortality cause-specific features, resulting in six feature clusters: Liver Failure, Infection, Renal Failure, Hypoxia, Cardiac Failure, and Mechanical Ventilation. This approach significantly improved upon previous manual methods, automating the reconstruction of structured hybrid models. While the GPT hybrid model showed similar predictive accuracy to a Global XGBoost model, it demonstrated superior interpretability and clinical relevance by incorporating a wider array of features and providing a hierarchical structure of feature importance aligned with medical knowledge.

conclusionWe introduce a novel approach to predicting in-ICU risk of death for mechanically ventilated patients using a GPT hybrid model. Our methodology demonstrates the potential of integrating large language models with traditional machine learning techniques to create interpretable and clinically relevant predictive models.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningRespiration, ArtificialHumansRisk AssessmentFeature clusteringHybrid mechanistic/data-driven modelingICU risk of death predictionInterpretable machine learningLarge language models

Identifiers

PMID41083982
PMCPMC12516888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.