Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083968›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025

Global evolution of female authorships in anesthesiology articles: an affiliation-based, longitudinal, scientometric analysis.

Clemens Miller, Johanna Rosenberger, Armin Sablewski, Marcus Nemeth, Peter Paal, Alexander Dejaco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clemens MillerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, Goettingen, 37075, Germany. clemens.miller@med.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-9167
Johanna RosenbergerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6856-7808
Armin SablewskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3132-589X
Marcus NemethDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Centre Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, Goettingen, 37075, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-7784
Peter PaalDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, St. John of God Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-4782
Alexander DejacoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1985-2102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough a gender gap in anesthesiology articles has been reported in certain subsets of anesthesiology literature, a comprehensive analysis is still lacking. Our objective was to conduct a scientometric analysis of the evolution of gender equity among anesthesiology authors worldwide, including all available affiliations. We hypothesized that gender inequity has diminished over time, with relevant differences among countries.

methodsThe MEDLINE/PubMed 2024 Baseline Repository was queried for all articles whose authors were affiliated with a department of anesthesiology. Author positions were sequenced into first, co-authors, and senior authors. Gender was inferred using online classification tools (genderize.io and gender-api.com). Geolocation was identified through text mining of the first author's affiliation. The primary endpoint was the evolution of female authors from 1987 to 2023, calculated descriptively and by average annual growth rates. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of female authors in first or senior author position, the influence of senior authors' gender on first authors' gender, geographical differences, and future projections of parity (defined as 50% female authors).

resultsAmong 374,301 anesthesiology articles and 7,574 journals, the proportion of female authors increased from 13.6% (1987) to 34.3% (2023) with an average annual growth of 0.57% (95%-confidence interval 0.38% - 0.77%). First authors were female in 30.0% and senior authors in 20.7%, with increases from 11.7% (1987) to 36.9% (2023), and from 11.0% (1987) to 25.9% (2023), respectively. Female authors were overall more likely to be first authors when the senior author was also female. In 2023, only Thailand and Portugal had a percentage of female authors over 50%. Tunisia achieved the highest average annual growth rate of female authors at 2.28% (95%-CI 1.51% - 3.06%). Based on the assumption that current trends continue unchanged, overall gender parity is estimated to be achieved by 2050, for first authors by 2043 and for senior authors by 2072.

conclusionsDespite an increase in recent decades, women are still underrepresented as authors in academic anesthesiology, particularly in leading authorship positions. While relevant differences between countries exist, strategies addressing this gender gap at a country-specific level are needed to promote female authorship in academic anesthesiology.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAuthorshipBibliometricsGender EquityPeriodicals as TopicFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleAnesthesiologyAuthorship trendsFemale authorshipGender equityGender parityScientometrics

Identifiers

PMID41083968
PMCPMC12516843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.