ArticleBMC cancer2025
The association between serum uric acid and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSerum uric acid (SUA), the end product of purine metabolism, may play a crucial role in the biology of several cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, data on the association of SUA with metastatic RCC (mRCC) survival are limited. Thus, we evaluated the prognostic importance of baseline serum uric acid in mRCC patients treated with targeted therapy.
methodsThe SUA level of 5.8 mg/dL was determined as the optimal cut-off point in predicting OS in the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in SUA groups. Cox proportional hazard models were performed to evaluate the association between SUA and survival outcomes.
resultsA total of 290 patients with a median age of 61 were included in the study. The median PFS and OS of all patients were 11.6 months and 45 months, respectively. The low-SUA group had superior PFS and OS times than the high-SUA group (16.2 months vs. 8.8 months, p < 0.001 for PFS; 92 months vs. 24.7 months, p < 0.001 for OS, respectively). The multivariate analysis indicated that high SUA levels remained an independent predictor of both PFS and OS after controlling for multiple confounders, including the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk scoring system (HR:1.79, 95%CI 1.35-2.37, p < 0.001 for PFS; HR: 3.32, 95%CI 2.33-4.72, p < 0.001 for OS).
conclusionsOur study highlights a noteworthy association between high SUA levels and adverse survival outcomes in patients with RCC treated with targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.