Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083959›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Clinical characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae compared to Streptococcus pneumoniae in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia- a prospective study.

Karin Hansen, Lisa Wasserstrom, Jonas Ahl, Anna C Nilsson, Kristian Riesbeck

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin HansenClinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. karin.hansen@med.lu.se.
Lisa WasserstromClinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jonas AhlClinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Anna C NilssonInfectious Diseases, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Kristian RiesbeckClinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus pneumoniae is the primary cause of hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Mycoplasma pneumoniae, though typically causing mild respiratory disease, can lead to pneumonia requiring hospitalization in adults. This study compared patients hospitalized with CAP caused by M. pneumoniae or S. pneumoniae aiming at increasing the understanding of when to sample for and empirically treat M. pneumoniae.

methodsFrom 2016 to 2018, 518 adults hospitalized with CAP were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Medical history, symptoms, radiographic, and laboratory data were recorded. Naso- and oropharyngeal swabs were collected for PCR detection of M. pneumoniae and other respiratory pathogens, while urine samples were analysed with two pneumococcal urinary antigens.

resultsA total of 32 patients with M. pneumoniae and 126 patients with S. pneumoniae were identified. Patients with M. pneumoniae were significantly younger than those with pneumococcal CAP with a median age 39 versus 70 years. Mycoplasma pneumoniae accounted for only 6% of CAP cases across all ages, but for 33% of cases in patients < 50 years. Mycoplasma pneumoniae patients had a longer duration of symptoms and were more often prescribed antibiotics prior to hospital admission. Neither symptoms nor chest imaging alone could distinguish between M. pneumoniae and S. pneumoniae. Although inflammatory markers such as CRP and leukocyte counts were significantly lower in M. pneumoniae CAP, the median CRP value was still elevated at 178 mg/L. Viral co-detection occurred in 14% of M. pneumoniae patients, compared to 42% of those with S. pneumoniae.

conclusionSymptoms and radiological findings could not distinguish between M. pneumoniae and S. pneumoniae. However, in hospitalized patients, particularly in younger individuals or those with antibiotic failure, liberal testing and treatment for M. pneumoniae is recommended.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsMycoplasma pneumoniaePneumonia, MycoplasmaPneumonia, PneumococcalStreptococcus pneumoniaeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired PneumoniaFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAdultsCAPMycoplasma pneumoniaePneumoniaStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID41083959
PMCPMC12516832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.