ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Factors contributing to bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers in Syria: findings from a multicenter cohort study.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Insights from Pathophysiology, Mechanisms, Pharmacotherapy, Phytotherapy, and Case Reports.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the formation of open lesions in the stomach or duodenum, leading to potentially life-threatening complications such as bleeding, perforation, and obstruction. Despite advances in understanding its pathophysiology and management, PUD continues to present significant health challenges, particularly in conflict-affected regions like Syria. This study investigates clinical presentation, demographic factors, and risk profiles associated with bleeding and perforated ulcers, aiming to contribute to evidence-based strategies for improving diagnosis and management in resource-limited settings.
methodsA multicenter cohort study was conducted across five major hospitals in Syria from 2018 to 2023, enrolling 242 patients diagnosed with bleeding or perforated ulcers. Demographic data, clinical histories, lifestyle factors, and medical interventions were collected from hospital records. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression, were performed to identify associations between ulcer types, demographic variables, and clinical outcomes.
resultsSignificant demographic differences were found between patients with bleeding and perforated ulcers. The bleeding group was older (mean age = 60.4 ± 18.7 years) compared to the perforation group (mean age = 49.4 ± 16.9 years), with rural residents more likely to experience bleeding ulcers (57.3%). Patients with a past history of peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, or other upper‑GI disorders were more likely to develop perforated ulcers, while those with multiple comorbidities were predisposed to bleeding ulcers. Lifestyle factors, such as occupation and smoking status, also influence ulcer type, with retired individuals more likely to develop bleeding ulcers and heavy smokers more often diagnosed with perforation. Clinical outcomes varied, with interventions predominantly consisting of open surgeries for perforated ulcers and laparoscopic approaches for bleeding ulcers.
conclusionThis study highlights the complex interplay of demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors in the presentation of bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers in Syria. The findings underscore the need for tailored, context-specific approaches in the management of PUD, particularly in conflict zones with limited healthcare access. This research provides valuable insights into predictors of ulcer type and complications, offering a foundation for evidence-based guidelines aimed at improving patient outcomes in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.