SynthesisJournal of neurology2025
Racial and ethnic disparities in endovascular treatment outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis meta-analysis aims to evaluate whether racial and ethnic disparities exist in outcomes following endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted through June 2024. We used Review Manager to pool data and calculate odds ratios (ORs) for categorical outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, all reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Our primary outcomes of interest were functional recovery and mortality 90 days after stroke.
resultsEleven studies involving 49,040 patients were included. Compared to non-Hispanic patients, Hispanic patients had significantly higher odds of poor functional recovery (mRS 3-6) at 90 days (OR: 1.54; 95% CI 1.20-1.98; P < 0.01), though mortality and sICH rates were similar. When comparing White and non-White patients, White patients had significantly higher 90-day mortality (OR: 1.36; 95% CI 1.15-1.60; P < 0.01), with no significant differences in sICH, recanalization success, or long-term functional recovery.
conclusionsDisparities in EVT outcomes for AIS appear to be driven more by post-procedural and systemic factors than by differences in the procedure itself. Hispanic patients face worse functional recovery despite similar acute outcomes, suggesting barriers in post-stroke care. Improved access to rehabilitation and culturally tailored support may help close these gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.