Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083898›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

Multitask benchmarking of single-cell multimodal omics integration methods.

Chunlei Liu, Sichang Ding, Hani Jieun Kim, Siqu Long, Di Xiao, Shila Ghazanfar, Pengyi Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Unifying multimodal single-cell data with a mixture-of-expertsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chunlei LiuComputational Systems Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1138-7488
Sichang DingComputational Systems Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Hani Jieun KimComputational Systems Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Siqu LongComputational Systems Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0590-7587
Di XiaoComputational Systems Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Shila GhazanfarSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7861-6997
Pengyi YangComputational Systems Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia. pengyi.yang@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1098-3138

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DE220100964Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1173469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell multimodal omics technologies have empowered the profiling of complex biological systems at a resolution and scale that were previously unattainable. These biotechnologies have propelled the fast-paced innovation and development of data integration methods, leading to a critical need for their systematic categorization, evaluation and benchmarking. Navigating and selecting the most pertinent integration approach poses a considerable challenge, contingent upon the tasks relevant to the study goals and the combination of modalities and batches present in the data at hand. Understanding how well each method performs multiple tasks, including dimension reduction, batch correction, cell type classification and clustering, imputation, feature selection and spatial registration, and at which combinations will help guide this decision. Here we develop a much-needed guideline on choosing the most appropriate method for single-cell multimodal omics data analysis through a systematic categorization and comprehensive benchmarking of current methods. The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 30 July 2024. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://springernature.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Multi-task_benchmarking_of_single-cell_multimodal_omics_integration_methods/26789902 .

Indexed as

BenchmarkingComputational BiologySingle-Cell AnalysisHumansProteomics

Identifiers

PMID41083898
PMCPMC12615258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.