ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2025
Re-evaluating the 'gonadal ganglion': anatomical insights into intermesenteric ganglia and gonadal innervation.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose“Gonadal ganglion” is occasionally used to describe ganglia at the origin of the gonadal artery that give rise to gonadal branches. To evaluate the anatomical accuracy of this term and clarify the structure of gonadal innervation, anatomical examinations of the preaortic plexus and its ganglia were required.
methodsThirty-six sides from eighteen elderly cadavers were analyzed to study the anatomical and histological features of gonadal innervation.
resultsThe intermesenteric plexus was found to form thick bilateral intermesenteric trunks accompanied by a thin preaortic plexus. Paucicellular preaortic ganglia containing only a few ganglion cells were widely distributed throughout the plexus, whereas dense preaortic ganglia (DCGs) were consistently located on each trunk. Although a clear interaction between the preaortic ganglia and both typical and atypical gonadal arteries was noted, several findings raise concerns about the anatomical validity of the term “gonadal ganglion.” First, 10 of 33 (30.3%) typical gonadal arteries lacked a DCG at the artery’s origin. Second, 15 of 40 DCGs (37.5%) contributed to gonadal innervation regardless of the gonadal artery’s origin. Although gonadal branches consistently followed the gonadal artery in the paraaortic region, their association with intermesenteric ganglia or gonadal artery origin in the preaortic region was variable.
conclusionRegardless of their location on the gonadal artery, the surrounding ganglia contribute only a few branches to the gonads but supply many branches to other structures. “Gonadal ganglion” should not be used to describe a ganglion with a single function. If necessary, it should be termed the “aortico-gonadal ganglion”.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41083886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.