Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083869›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessment of ChatGPT performance in orbital MRI reporting with multimetric evaluation of transformer based language models.

Alessandro Tel, Federico Bolognesi, Luca Michelutti, Federico Biglioli, Massimo Robiony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessandro TelMaxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Department of Head & Neck and Neuroscience, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. alessandro.tel@uniud.it.
Federico BolognesiDivision of Maxillofacial surgery, Head and Neck Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca MicheluttiMaxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Department of Head & Neck and Neuroscience, Academic Hospital of Udine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Federico BiglioliDivision of Maxillofacial Surgery, Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Postgraduate School of Maxillofacial Surgery, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Massimo RobionyDepartment of Head & Neck and Neuroscience, Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Postgraduate School of Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transformer-based large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT-4, are increasingly used to streamline clinical practice, of which radiology reporting is a prominent aspect. However, their performance in interpreting complex anatomical regions from MRI data remains largely unexplored. This study investigates the capability of ChatGPT-4 to produce clinically reliable reports based on orbital MR images, applying a multimetric, quantitative evaluation framework in 25 patients with orbital lesions. Due to inherent limitations of current version of GPT-4, the model was not fed with MR volumetric data, but key 2D images only. For each case, ChatGPT-4 generated a free-text report, which was then compared to the corresponding ground-truth report authored by a board-certified radiologist. Evaluation included established NLP metrics (BLEU-4, ROUGE-L, BERTScore), clinical content recognition scores (RadGraph F1, CheXbert), and expert human judgment. Among the automated metrics, BERTScore demonstrated the highest language similarity, while RadGraph F1 best captured clinical entity recognition. Clinician assessment revealed moderate agreement with the LLM outputs, with performance decreasing in complex or infiltrative cases. The study highlights both the promise and current limitations of LLMs in radiology, particularly regarding their inability to process volumetric data and maintain spatial consistency. These findings suggest that while LLMs may assist in structured reporting, effective integration into diagnostic imaging workflows will require coupling with advanced vision models capable of full 3D interpretation.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNatural Language ProcessingOrbitFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleArtificial intelligenceChatGPTNLP metricsOrbital MRIRadiology report generationTransformer-based language models

Identifiers

PMID41083869
PMCPMC12518657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.