Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083842›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Enhanced Histopathologic Image Analysis for Mouth Cancer Classification Using Morphological Reconstruction and UNet.

M Shyamala Devi, S Priya, Usha Desai, Biswaranjan Acharya, Fernando Moreira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Shyamala DeviDepartment of Robot and Smart System Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80, Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu, 41566, Republic of Korea.
S PriyaManipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru Campus, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Usha DesaiDepartment of CSE (IoT-CSBT), S.E.A College of Engineering & Technology, Bengaluru, India.
Biswaranjan AcharyaDepartment of Computer Engineering - AI & BDA, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Fernando MoreiraREMIT, IJP Universidade Portucalense, Porto & IEETA, Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. fmoreira@upt.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-1445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouth cancer represents a significant global public health challenge due to its high incidence rate and potentially fatal outcomes if not diagnosed early. Among the various types, oral cancer is notably prevalent and poses considerable diagnostic complexity due to its intricate histopathological architecture. According to the World Health Organization and recent epidemiological studies, oral cancer accounts for approximately 377,000 new cases and 177,000 deaths annually worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methodologies such as manual clinical inspection and biopsy analysis are often time-intensive, inherently subjective, and susceptible to inter-observer variability among pathologists. To address these limitations, this study proposes novel framework, termed Depthwise Separable Convolution U-Net (DWSU-Net), aimed at enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of mouth cancer detection. Unlike traditional U-Net, which employs computationally expensive standard convolutional layers, DWSU-Net integrates depthwise separable convolutional blocks into both encoder and decoder stages, reducing parameter count and training complexity while preserving representational power. This makes the model more lightweight, scalable, and suitable for real-time or resource-constrained clinical environments. The research utilizes histopathologic images of oral tissues obtained from the publicly available oral cancer detection dataset on Kaggle, which were captured using a Leica ICC50 HD microscope. The proposed approach initiates with a comprehensive data preprocessing pipeline involving multiple filtering techniques. Raw histopathological images are transformed using Sobel filtering, Otsu thresholding, Canny edge detection, and morphological reconstruction via erosion, thereby improving feature saliency and contrast in malignant regions. The preprocessed dataset is partitioned into training, validation, and testing subsets in an 80:10:10 ratio and evaluated using fivefold cross-validation to ensure the robustness and generalizability of the model. A comparative analysis was conducted using conventional CNN architectures to identify the most effective combination of model and filtering technique. Empirical results indicated that MobileNet and U-Net, when applied to images filtered through morphological reconstruction by erosion, yielded superior classification performance. Motivated by these findings, the proposed DWSU-Net architecture was developed by integrating the strengths of MobileNet and U-Net. The novelty of the DWSU-Net model lies in morphological reconstruction-based preprocessing, which enhances interpretability by making malignant regions more distinct for both the algorithm and pathologists, thereby bridging the gap between AI predictions and clinical understanding. By combining efficiency, robustness, and interpretability, DWSU-Net goes beyond accuracy gains, offering a clinically relevant decision-support framework. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed model achieves an outstanding classification accuracy of 99.74% in distinguishing between healthy and malignant oral tissue images, underscoring its potential for clinical deployment in automated cancer diagnostics.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMouth NeoplasmsAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansCannyCNNConvolutionDeep learningDWSCErosion imageFilteringUNet

Identifiers

PMID41083842
PMCPMC13481602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.