ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Worse Survival in Co-Altered RAS-TP53 Patients With Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC): Prospective Cohort with its Nested Randomized Controlled Trial Provides an Example Distinguishing Causation From Association.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNext-generation sequencing provides valuable information about mutations within colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) that impact survival. Existing data focus on prognostic implications of single gene mutations. This study assessed the impact of co-alterations on KRAS/NRAS and TP53 after CRLM resection.
methodsA retrospective analysis was performed for patients with CRLM who underwent surgical management and had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed to assess associations with clinical outcomes. Groups were stratified by the presence or absence of RAS-TP53 co-alterations (RTC).
resultsThe study cohort consisted of 155 patients with NGS data, with 42 patients (27%) harboring RTC. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The RTC patients had more right-side primary tumors (45% vs. 26%; P = 0.028), presented more frequently with synchronous CRLM (91% vs. 72%; P = 0.017), and were more often deemed initially unresectable (26% vs. 12%; P = 0.038). Medical and surgical management were comparable between the groups, with the majority of the patients receiving systemic therapy (97% overall) and undergoing wedge partial hepatectomies (59% overall). The RTC patients had worse recurrence-free and overall survival, and experienced extrahepatic recurrences sooner (median, 9 vs 14 months; P = 0.014). In the multivariate analyses, RTC (hazard ratio [HR, 2.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.054-4.088; P = 0.035) and post-recurrence locoregional treatments (HR, 0.446; 95% CI 0.222-0.896; P = 0.023) were independently associated with survival.
conclusionsThe RTC patients presented more often with synchronous CRLM, and RTC also was associated with worse oncologic outcomes, suggestive of more aggressive tumor biology. Integration of genome-sequencing data beyond single gene mutations may provide important prognostic information for patients with CRLM to guide management decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41083826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.