ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Patient-Centric Drug Product Quality Specifications: a Convergence of Clinical and Nonclinical Considerations.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A special panel session at the 2024 NCS Conference in Wiesbaden, Germany, brought together experts to explore the evolving landscape of patient-centric drug product development and specifications. Traditional specifications often rely on manufacturing variability and phase 3 clinical trial data. However, patient-centric specifications shift the focus toward direct clinical relevance, establishing customer-driven acceptance criteria. Discussions covered innovative approaches to defining patient-centric specifications, leveraging prior knowledge, biopharmaceutics, formulation science, regulatory input, and statistical methodologies. The session also highlighted efficient QbD studies, enabling the linkage of Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and Critical Material Attributes (CMAs) to Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs). While these approaches hold great promise, challenges remain such as cross-disciplinary collaboration, data integration, and the development of robust databases to inform future drug and biologicals development. As industry experience grows, these efforts will pave the way for continuous improvement in nonclinical-clinical linkage designs, enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41083814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.