SynthesisTranslational stroke research2025
Association of MR-proANP Circulating Levels with Ischemic Stroke of Cardioembolic Etiology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in stroke biomarkers - implications for prognosis and treatment.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate identification of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) etiology is fundamental for its management. Midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) shows potential as a biomarker of cardioembolic (CE) etiology. We aimed to review and synthesize all data on the association between MR-proANP and CE stroke. Articles were searched in Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline databases up to March 2025. Search terms included the free-text words to identify "stroke" and "MR-pro-ANP" and the Mesh term "Stroke." A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. ROBINS-E Tool was used for quality assessment. Eight studies were included, from which six evaluated the association between MR-proANP and CE etiology in patients with AIS and two evaluated MR-proANP levels in the general population and their association with the risk of future CE stroke. All studies were consistent in describing significantly higher levels of MR-proANP in patients with CE stroke when compared to non-CE stroke. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis, confirming a significant association between MR-proANP and CE etiology (OR 6.04, 95% CI 2.79-13.07). Also, MR-proANP showed moderate to high discriminative ability in identifying CE strokes, significantly improving the discriminative capacity of clinical models, and a strong association with atrial fibrillation (AF). Finally, higher MR-proANP levels were associated with an increased risk of future CE stroke. MR-proANP circulating levels were consistently associated with CE etiology of ischemic stroke, improving the discriminative ability of clinical models, suggesting a role for this biomarker in the accurate classification of AIS etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41083810What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.