ArticleScientific reports2025
A study on adverse drug events of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in lung cancer treatment: a decade-long data mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta- and network meta-analysis.Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Adverse drug reaction assessment of pembrolizumab and nivolumab in esophageal cancer treatment based on the US FAERS database.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Long-term follow-up of tislelizumab combined with anlotinib in a single patient with metastatic type B3 thymoma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors provide new opportunities to reduce global burden of lung cancer. However, adverse drug events (ADEs) pose significant risks to patient health, warranting systematic attention. Data on ADEs associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for lung cancer treatment were collected from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between January 2014 and June 2023. Logistic regression was used to explore potential factors related to death. Signal mining for ADEs was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) methods, which revealed toxicity characteristics of these inhibitors among different system organ classes (SOCs) in terms of the number of both ADEs and ADE signals, and the signal strength. Additionally, factors associated with the timing of the first ADE were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests. A total of 36,387 reports were collected. It is indicated that patients aged 65 years above, male, with small-cell lung cancer, treated with PD-1 inhibitors, without chemotherapy combination, experiencing earlier first ADE occurrence, and with more ADEs were at higher risk of death. Signal mining revealed 175, 189, 74, and 123 ADE signals for nivolumab (N), pembrolizumab (P), durvalumab (D), and atezolizumab (A), respectively. For SOC characteristics, ADEs associated with N were most frequently distributed in 'General disorders and administration site conditions', with the highest signal strength in 'Endocrine disorders'. P had the highest ADE signal frequency and strength in 'Immune system disorders'. For D, the highest frequency of ADEs and ADE signals, and the highest signal strength were in 'Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders'. Uniquely, A exhibited significant signal strength in 'Blood and lymphatic system disorders'. 'Blood and lymphatic system disorders' and 'Endocrine disorders' had the earliest and latest ADE onset respectively. Death outcome and chemotherapy combinations were associated with earlier onset. And significant timing differences existed among different inhibitors. Based on 36,387 reports, this study comprehensively reveals the characteristics of ADEs associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, providing valuable reference for their future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.