ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on rural landscape design strategies integrating computer vision and deep learning: an analysis based on human perception and visual aesthetics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing application of artificial intelligence in environmental design, computer vision and deep learning have emerged as crucial tools for understanding human visual perception. This study focuses on rural landscapes and proposes a visual comfort evaluation model that combines structural visual attributes with deep semantic representations. By employing Residual Network (ResNet101) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), the model enables quantitative prediction of aesthetic preferences for landscape images. The dataset combines original field photographs with screened samples from the Places365 dataset, categorized and preprocessed under unified visual standards. Multiple visualization methods are also incorporated to enhance model interpretability. The results indicate that green ratio, sky openness, and edge density are among the most influential factors associated with visual comfort scores, although the overall predictive strength remains moderate. These results reflect a preference pattern characterized by brightness, naturalness, openness, and simplicity, although the overall predictive strength remains moderate. Furthermore, the study establishes a feedback framework of "score-structure-strategy" and presents four categories of rural landscape design recommendations, bridging perceptual modeling with spatial design. This research contributes to the quantification of perceptual aesthetics and offers a perception-oriented data framework for rural landscape design in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.