Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083772›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Best practice mass photometry: a guide to optimal single-molecule mass measurement.

Jiří Kratochvíl, Raman van Wee, Jan Christoph Thiele, Dan Loewenthal, Jack Bardzil, Kishwar Iqbal, Justin L P Benesch, Stephen Thorpe, Philipp Kukura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NIPBL and STAG1 enable loop extrusion by providing differential DNA-cohesin affinity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Monomers and short oligomers of human RAD52 promote single-strand annealing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiří Kratochvíl *The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-1562
Raman van Wee *The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8941-3693
Jan Christoph Thiele *The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-6298
Dan Loewenthal *The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-1714
Jack Bardzil *The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kishwar Iqbal *The Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Justin L P BeneschThe Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen ThorpeThe Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. stephen.thorpe@chem.ox.ac.uk.
Philipp KukuraThe Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. philipp.kukura@chem.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0136-7704

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) PHOTOMASS 819593RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/W00349X/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EPRSC Doctoral Training Partnership.RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/T03419X/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/TO3419X/1Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) 218514/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass photometry (MP) has emerged as a powerful approach to study quaternary biomolecular structure, dynamics and interactions. The capabilities of the method ultimately hinge on the ability to accurately measure the tiny optical contrast generated by individual molecules at a glass-water interface, which enables mass-resolved quantification of biomolecular mixtures. Ideally, this capability is limited only by photon shot noise, but in practice depends on additional parameters and details of the assay. Here, we focus on the key factors affecting MP performance and present simple steps that can be taken to achieve optimal MP measurements in terms of mass resolution, quantitative detection limit, reproducibility and analyte concentration range without compromising the speed and simplicity of the technique. Each sample takes <10 min to analyse, with an additionial 2 h if amination of the glass surface is desired.

Indexed as

PhotometrySingle Molecule ImagingGlassReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.