ArticleScientific reports2025
Prototype based contrastive graph clustering network for reducing false negatives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contrastive graph clustering methods significantly enhance the clustering performance of graph data by leveraging multi-view augmentation and contrastive loss. In particular, Self-Supervised Graph Contrastive Learning (SS-GCL) has gained attention due to its lower dependence on labeled data. However, SS-GCL approaches often rely on pseudo-labeling to categorize samples into positive and negative pairs, which can lead to false negatives and degrade clustering performance. To address this issue, a prototype-driven contrastive graph clustering network is proposed. This network uses prototypes as data-driven cluster centers to form high-confidence sample sets while discarding boundary samples and aggregating the remaining samples into augmented embeddings. Additionally, a cross-view decoupled contrastive learning mechanism is designed, utilizing a mean squared error contrastive loss function based solely on positive samples. This mechanism performs alignment calculations across views for the augmented positive sample embeddings, effectively preventing the generation of false negative samples. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms current state-of-the-art baseline methods regarding accuracy and clustering effectiveness across multiple datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.