ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Pathologic myopia.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subthreshold micropulse laser for subretinal fluid after vitrectomy in myopic traction maculopathy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- Progression with myopia control spectacles: identifying predictors of response to defocus incorporated multiple segment and highly aspherical lenslets spectacles in the French myopia cohort.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Novel CPAMD8 Variants in Congenital Cataract and Candidate Variants in Pathologic Myopia.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence assisted quantitative analysis of fundus structural and vascular alterations reveals fundus tessellation as a robust biomarker of myopia severity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Strategies for the Prevention and Control of Complications of Pathological Myopia: A Systematic Review of Research Progress from Axial Control to Target Organ Protection.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Selective retinal neuron loss and impaired neurovascular support underlie myopic retinopathy in RPE-specific Lrp2-deficient mice.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathologic myopia (PM) represents a predominant cause of irreversible visual loss worldwide, characterised by progressive axial elongation and profound structural alterations in the posterior segment, notably posterior staphyloma. Posterior staphyloma is a cardinal feature of PM and must be differentiated from physiological myopia, as it indicates localised scleral thinning and ectasia directly impacting the macula and optic nerve. Vision-threatening complications such as myopic traction maculopathy (MTM), frequently driven by vitreoretinal traction on retinal vasculature, and macular atrophy secondary to myopic macular neovascularisation (MNV) are prevalent in PM, often culminating in severe visual impairment. The sclera serves a critical biomechanical role in maintaining ocular structural integrity; hence, targeted interventions aimed at reinforcing the posterior sclera may decelerate disease progression. Although three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) has been extensively utilised to visualise the entire shape of the eye, recent advancements such as ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography (UWF-OCT) permit more detailed, practical assessment of posterior segment alterations. Furthermore, polarisation-sensitive OCT (PS-OCT) offers non-invasive in vivo evaluation of scleral collagen fibre orientation and birefringence, deepening our understanding of staphyloma pathogenesis. Early detection of structural changes within the sclera and vitreoretinal interface is paramount for timely intervention to prevent irreversible neuroretinal damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.