Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083721›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Guidelines for genetic counselling supervision in Europe: a roadmap for ethical, effective, and reflective practice.

Lídia Guimarães, Marina Serra Lemos, Margarida Rangel Henriques, Milena Paneque

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lídia Guimarãesi3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. lguimaraes@i3s.up.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-3229-5785
Marina Serra LemosFPCEUP-Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5259-7935
Margarida Rangel HenriquesFPCEUP-Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6584-4691
Milena Panequei3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6535-4315

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article presents key guidelines for developing an effective and structured Genetic Counselling Supervision (GCS) framework for Europe. Based on international best practices and the authors' research at both the European and national levels, these 21 guidelines aim to provide a structured approach that will promote ethical standards, enhance professional well-being, and improve service quality, ensuring the successful implementation of GCS across healthcare settings in Europe. By doing so, this article seeks to address a critical gap identified by professionals and policymakers regarding the lack of clear guidance on what should drive genetic counselling supervision.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingPractice Guidelines as TopicEuropeHumans

Identifiers

PMID41083721
PMCPMC13341757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.