ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2025
Evidence to action: a perspective on treatment approaches for food addiction.
Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of food addiction research is rapidly progressing, with the emergence of a range of treatment studies. These have taken a variety of formats and approaches, given the clustering of food addiction with other health conditions, namely increased weight and mental disorders (e.g. depression, anxiety, PTSD, binge eating disorder). The food addiction treatment field comprises numerous systematic reviews synthesizing research from self-help groups, psychosocial interventions, lifestyle management, pharmacology, supplements, bariatric surgery, disordered eating, substance use and harm minimization approaches. Arising treatment approaches should consider the existing evidence base, and lessons learned in order to advance the field. High quality publications, studies statistically powered for change, using evidence-based strategies and behaviour change theories, and the involvement of individuals with lived experience to develop and refine interventions are needed to propel the field forward. Using reporting checklists to describe complex interventions [e.g. TIDieR framework (Template for Intervention Description and Replication)] will also be beneficial to inform future research studies, allowing replication and modification as required, and implementation into clinical practice. This perspective discusses existing knowledge in the area of treatment approaches for food addiction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41083706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.