ArticleScientific reports2025
Zebra finch tutees not only share the melody but also the rhythm of their tutor's song.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted rhythmic patterns in the vocalizations of several animal species, particularly in songbirds. Whilst it is known that for instance zebra finches copy the spectral content of their tutor's song, little is known about possible rhythmic copying. In this study, analyzing the inter-onset intervals of the elements in the motifs of 17 tutors and their 37 tutees shows that rhythms are most similar between tutors and their respective tutees - though only when considering the whole motif produced by the tutee. When examining only shared or only non-shared elements, rhythmic patterns differed. This suggests that the shared rhythm goes beyond copying the temporal features of individual elements; tutees perhaps adjust the rhythm of non-shared intervals, resulting in an overall rhythm resembling their tutors'. Furthermore, tutees who share all elements tend to sing slower, more consistent rhythms, while those who improvise more in elements or melody show greater variability in both rhythmic rate and consistency. This might hint at two distinct evolutionary strategies: one favoring consistent, slower rhythms, the other favoring novelty. Female choice experiments might be the next step to prove this hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.