ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing light efficiency in phase-only holograms via neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial neural networks have emerged as powerful tools for hologram synthesis and reconstruction, offering improvements in both image quality and computational efficiency. In this work, we present ShuffleResnet, a neural phase encoding approach designed to address the limitations of the conventional double phase encoding method (DPM) used for phase-only spatial light modulators (SLMs). The proposed model, ShuffleResnet, significantly enhances light efficiency, achieving a 59% increase compared to the conventional DPM. Numerical simulation results further demonstrate that the proposed model improves reconstruction quality and effectively suppresses artifacts in the complex field. Additionally, the model encodes complex field holograms at 1920 × 1080 resolution with an average inference speed of 4.74 milliseconds per hologram. The enhanced reconstruction fidelity increased light efficiency and fast inference, suggesting strong potential for real-time holographic applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.