ArticleScientific reports2025
Life's essential 8 and risk of progression to diabetes among young adults with prediabetes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess Life's Essential 8 (LE8) trajectories by glycemic status change and examine their association with diabetes progression risk in young adults with prediabetes (preDM). We used the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study (CARDIA) Year 7-30 data to estimate trends of LE8 scores among preDM participants (impaired fasting glucose, impaired oral glucose tolerance, and/or HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) by status of progression, consistent preDM, and regression. We used logistic regression to evaluate the progression risk with LE8. Among 974 preDM participants, 34% progressed to diabetes, 28% remained preDM, and 38% regressed to euglycemia. Over a mean follow-up of 13 years, the progression group had the greatest decline in LE8 scores. Ideal LE8 scores (vs. moderate or poor) were associated with a 40-90% reduction in the progression risk. In conclusion, maintaining optimal cardiovascular health may prevent diabetes progression among young adults with preDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.