ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of an unsupervised denoising approach based on Noise2Void in digital mammography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telemedicine and 5G Technologies: A Systematic Global Review of Applications over the Past Decade.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) is the most common imaging technique for breast cancer screening programs. Still, it is limited by noise from quantum effects, electronic issues, and X-ray scattering, affecting the image quality. Traditional denoising methods based on filters and transformations perform poorly due to the complex, tissue-dependent nature of noise, while supervised deep learning methods require extensive, often unavailable datasets with paired noisy and noiseless images. Consequently, unsupervised denoising methods, which do not require clean images as ground truth, are gaining attention. However, their application to FFDM is poorly explored. This study investigates the use of Noise2Void (N2V), an unsupervised denoising approach adapted to digital mammography images for the first time. N2V employs blind spot masking to remove noise without requiring noiseless images. The method was assessed using different metrics on real clinical images and artificially noised images: contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and structural similarity index (SSIM). A qualitative evaluation was also made based on a questionnaire provided to radiologists. The results show that evaluated metrics increase on N2V images; these results are comparable with traditional methods. Despite showing quantitative performance comparable to traditional methods, N2V retains potential for clinical application as a flexible, annotation-free approach for retrospective, low-dose mammography imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.