ArticleScientific reports2025
Streamlined and efficient patient-specific modeling for lumbar spine segmentation and finite element analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI parameters for enhancing spine surgery outcomes: a narrative review.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Review
- Effects of aquatic therapy vs. standard care on gluteal muscle morphology and function in individuals with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A Review of Finite Element Analysis in Spine Surgery Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Review of Motion-Preserving Cervical Spinal Implants and Fusion Constructs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in biomechanical modeling of lumbar spine diseases and tumors: gaps, opportunities, and AI integration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advancing our understanding of spinal biomechanics through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is essential for clinical decision-making and biomechanical research. Traditional FEA workflows are hindered by manual segmentation and meshing, introducing inconsistencies, user variability, and lengthy processing times. This study presents a streamlined, patient-specific modeling methodology for the lumbar spine that fundamentally transforms the FEA preprocessing pipeline. By integrating deep learning-based segmentation with advanced computational tools such as the GIBBON library and FEBio, our approach minimizes manual intervention, accelerates model preparation, and enhances both accuracy and reproducibility. The proposed workflow enables precise extraction and meshing of key anatomical structures including cortical and cancellous bone, intervertebral discs, ligaments, and cartilage directly from clinical CT imaging data. Robust segmentation techniques ensure accurate identification and separation of these components, which are subsequently converted into high-resolution surface and volumetric meshes. To optimize model fidelity and computational efficiency, the pipeline incorporates geometric smoothing and adaptive mesh decimation. Ligament attachment is addressed through an innovative coordinate-based framework that leverages anatomical landmarks for automated placement and orientation, overcoming a major challenge in FEA preprocessing. The results demonstrate that the resulting subject-specific models reproduce physiological biomechanics with high fidelity. Range of Motion and stress distribution outcomes closely match experimental data and established numerical models, confirming the pipeline's accuracy. Importantly, preparation time is reduced from days to just hours, delivering an efficient, reproducible workflow. By unifying segmentation, meshing, and ligament modeling in a single efficient framework, this study establishes a scalable platform for rapid, reliable, and anatomically accurate FEA of the lumbar spine, with significant implications for clinical diagnostics and preoperative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.