ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting road adhesion coefficient with a fusion strategy of SHAP dynamic parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately estimating the road adhesion coefficient is essential for ensuring vehicle driving safety. This study proposes a method that integrates a seven-degree-of-freedom vehicle model and the magic formula tire model with the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm, leveraging Shapley Additive exPlanations values to determine feature importance. Based on this, a road adhesion coefficient estimation model is constructed, incorporating a Bayesian neural network and a Support vector regression to enhance interpretability. To address potential issues such as the model predicting road adhesion coefficients beyond the range present in the training data, a data fusion strategy is designed to improve generalization. Simulation results demonstrate that the fusion estimator outperforms individual models in terms of robustness, real-time performance, and prediction accuracy, especially under varying vehicle speeds and road conditions. Compared to a single estimator, the data fusion model reduced the mean square error by an average of 16.01% and 18.89%, respectively, while the root mean square error was reduced by an average of 11.33% and 16.04%, respectively. This approach provides valuable theoretical support to advance the development of vehicle active safety systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.