ArticleScientific reports2025
Computer-assisted quantitative framework for whole slide cervical image grading driven by time series features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The thinprep cytologic test is widely used for cervical cancer diagnosis, with results reliant on cytotechnicians screening specific cell categories on slides, lacking robustness. This paper introduces a two-stage quantitative detection framework for whole slide cervical images, aiding pathologists in effectively assigning lesion grades. Our approach utilizes a You Only Look Once network with an attention module and multi-scale feature fusion to enhance representation refinement and improve cervical cell classification precision (0.8647) and true positive rate (95.8%). We incorporate a quantitative DNA description, leveraging the Matthew effect to refine diagnostic contributions, establishing a clearer standard for cell proliferation assessment. By extracting time series features and leveraging global smear information, our model enhances detection robustness, enriches the screening system, and resists false cell classification influences (smear-level accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.9193, 0.9285, 0.9234). We elucidate the significance of time series features in cervical cancer detection, demonstrating efficient global smear information utilization. Evaluation on clinical datasets underscores the relationship between time series features and patient physiological states, facilitating seamless integration into current diagnostic systems, enriching detection principles, and achieving comparable grading accuracy to professional pathologists in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.