ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptive neural mechanisms of self face recognition after face transplantation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aims to investigate the behavioral and neural responses of a face transplant patient (FTP) to his pre-operative and post-operative faces. For this purpose, a control group (N = 15) and a single FTP were presented images of their past face, present face, and other unfamiliar faces and asked to identify whether these faces belonged to them or not. During the task, electrophysiological and behavioral responses were recorded. The FTP exhibited higher N170 amplitudes for his past face compared to the control group, suggesting increased visual processing due to its distinctiveness. N250 latency was shorter for his past face, indicating a profoundly ingrained self-identity. P300 amplitudes to his present face were significantly higher, potentially reflecting cognitive adaptation to his transplanted identity. Behaviorally, the control group identified their past faces more quickly, whereas the FTP demonstrated delayed and less accurate recognition of both his past and present faces. This study presents the first ERP-based comparison of an FTP with a control group, highlighting the dynamic nature of self-face perception and neural plasticity. The findings suggest that self-face identity is a flexible process influenced by past experiences and adaptation mechanisms, offering important implications for rehabilitation and psychological support in face transplantation cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.