Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083497›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Identifying key uncertainties in energy transitions with a Puerto Rico case study.

Kamiar Khayambashi, Andres F Clarens, William M Shobe, Negin Alemazkoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamiar KhayambashiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9882-7901
Andres F ClarensDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-9717
William M ShobeBatten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-0541
Negin AlemazkoorDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. na7fp@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-3985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deterministic energy transition planning risks uninformed decisions. Yet, the challenge of high-dimensional uncertainty-encompassing various technological, economic, social, and climatic factors-often leads to a deterministic treatment or simplification of uncertainties in planning. Here, we propose a computationally efficient framework that leverages surrogate-based sensitivity analysis to identify the key uncertainty sources driving the cost of different energy transition scenarios. We applied the proposed approach to Puerto Rico as a hurricane-prone power system that lacks efficient management. We find that changes in the frequency of hurricanes and organizational inefficiency are the two primary sources of uncertainty determining the system's total expected cost. When examining operational costs, different transition scenarios demonstrate unique key uncertainty sources. For example, the price of biofuel would mainly drive the operational cost when transitioning to a fully renewable power system. These findings can help planners by allowing them to focus on a narrower set of uncertainties in planning.

Identifiers

PMID41083497
PMCPMC12518712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.