ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying key influencers of patient satisfaction using an explainable machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpretable SHAP-based machine learning framework for patient satisfaction prediction: a case study in Thammasat University Hospital.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is a crucial measure of healthcare quality, influencing both health outcomes and care experiences. This study aims to identify the factors influencing patient satisfaction in healthcare facilities using machine learning algorithms due to their strong predictive capabilities. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 312 patients from two private hospitals in Rangpur, Bangladesh. Machine learning models, including LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost, were used to predict patient satisfaction, and SHAP value analysis was employed for interpretation. The LightGBM classifier (before SMOTE) outperforms other models across metrics, with the highest accuracy (0.85), MCC (0.69), and ROC-AUC(0.83) scores, establishing it as the optimal predictive model for this study. SHAP analysis further reveals that factors such as treatment plan, age, appointment ease, waiting time, and medication details significantly influence satisfaction levels. Overall, results indicate that structured interactions, shorter waiting times, and clear communication are associated with higher satisfaction, while extended waiting times and lack of decision involvement negatively impact patient experiences. To enhance patient satisfaction, healthcare providers should prioritize improving communication, reducing wait times, and offering clear treatment plans. Future research should explore additional factors to refine predictive models. The LightGBM classifier provides valuable insights into the key determinants of patient satisfaction, enabling healthcare practitioners and researchers to utilize it for targeted prediction and analysis in their specific contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.