Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083488›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Developing highly accurate machine learning models for optimizing water quality management decisions in tilapia aquaculture.

Ashwaq M Alnemari, Wael M Elmessery, Amjad S Qazaq, Moustapha E Moustapha, Saule Rakhimgaliyeva, Mohamed F A Abuhussein, Sadeq K Alhag, Laila A Al-Shuraym, Farahat S Moghanm, Péter Szűcs and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashwaq M AlnemariBiology Department, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box: 83, 11940, Al- Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Wael M ElmesseryAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr el-Sheikh, Egypt.
Amjad S QazaqDepartment of Water Management and Environment, Prince El-Hassan bin Talal Faculty for Natural Resources and Environment, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Moustapha E MoustaphaDepartment of Chemistry, College of Sciences and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, 16273, Al- Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Saule RakhimgaliyevaZhangir khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University, st. Zhangir Khan, 51, Uralsk, 090000, Kazakhstan.
Mohamed F A AbuhusseinTutankhamun Research School for Artificial Intelligence (TRSAI), Kafrelsheikh , Egypt.
Sadeq K AlhagHealth Specialties, Basic Sciences and Applications Unit, Applied College, King Khalid University Mohayil Asir Abha, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Laila A Al-ShuraymBiology Department, Faculty of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Farahat S MoghanmZhangir khan West Kazakhstan Agrarian-Technical University, st. Zhangir Khan, 51, Uralsk, 090000, Kazakhstan.
Péter SzűcsInstitute of Environmental Management, Faculty of Earth Science, University of Miskolc, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, 3515, Hungary.
Mohamed Hamdy EidInstitute of Environmental Management, Faculty of Earth Science, University of Miskolc, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, 3515, Hungary. Mohamed.hemida@uni-miskolc.hu.
Abdallah Elshawadfy ElwakeelAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Aswan University, Aswan, 81528, Egypt. abdallah_elshawadfy@agr.aswu.edu.eg.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University R.G.P.2/31/46Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University PNURSP2025R365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimization of water quality management is crucial for the success and sustainability of tilapia aquaculture. This study presents a novel approach for developing a decision-support system by comparing various machine learning models to predict optimal water quality management actions based on key environmental parameters. The novelty of this work lies in its focus on automating management decisions, moving beyond simple parameter prediction. A synthetic dataset, representing 20 critical water quality scenarios, was generated and used for model development. This dataset was preprocessed using class balancing with SMOTETomek and feature scaling. Several machine learning algorithms, namely Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, and Neural Networks, were trained and evaluated. Additionally, a Voting Classifier ensemble model was employed to leverage the strengths of these individual models. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, with cross-validation conducted to ensure robustness. The results demonstrated that multiple models including the ensemble Voting Classifier, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and Neural Network models, achieved perfect accuracy on the held-out test set. Cross-validation confirmed high performance across all top models, with the Neural Network achieving the highest mean accuracy of 98.99% ± 1.64%. Rather than identifying a single optimal model, this study demonstrates that model selection should be guided by specific deployment requirements, with each approach offering distinct advantages for different operational priorities. The proposed machine learning approach offers a promising tool for optimizing water quality management in Tilapia aquaculture, providing a foundation for data-driven systems that can improve efficiency, productivity, and sustainability in the industry.

Indexed as

AquacultureMachine LearningTilapiaWater QualityAlgorithmsAnimalsNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineMachine learningPredictive modelingTilapia aquacultureWater quality management

Identifiers

PMID41083488
PMCPMC12518843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.