ArticleScientific reports2025
Classification of cotton leaf disease using YOLOv8 based k-fold cross validation deep learning method for precision agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Deep Learning Model for Chili Pepper Fruit Shape Classification Using DenseNet-121 and CBAM.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cotton production is a crucial agricultural industry, a raw material source for the textiles sector and a major source of livelihood for more than 30 million farmers globally. The yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium) are influenced by different types of stress and diseases. Deep Learning as a solution for disease prevention, detection, and management can increase the yield, reduce the cost and improve the quality of crop. This study presents a robust method using 10-fold cross-validation with the YOLOv8 DL model for precise cotton leaf disease recognition. The k-fold cross-validation mitigates overfitting by training the model on diverse data subsets, which leads to enhanced generalizability while ensuring reliable performance. The proposed method achieved 99.60% and 100% as Top_1 and Top_5 accuracy, respectively. The method also achieved a recall of 99.53%, a precision of 99.53%, and an F1 score of 99.60%. During 10 trials, the method consistently performed with an average. Top_1 and Top_5 accuracy of 98.41% and 100% respectively, recall 98.53%, precision 98.39% and F1 score 98.42%.This study is among the first to apply YOLOv8 classification with 10-fold cross-validation for multi-class cotton leaf disease identification using field-captured images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.