ArticleBiopreservation and biobanking2026
The Stability of Never-Thawed Serum Biospecimens Stored in Vapor-Phase Liquid Nitrogen: Select Analytes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2000 and 2005-2006.
Article in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe effect of prolonged storage (12-19 years) on selected laboratory test results is examined in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey biospecimen collection to determine whether biospecimens stored long term in vapor-phase liquid nitrogen provide valid results once remeasured.
methodsBiospecimens were selected for remeasurement using systematic random sampling for five analytes: cotinine, methylmalonic acid (MMA), vitamin A, vitamin E, and hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA). Measurements from the original specimens in 1999-2000 or 2005-2006 are compared with 2018-2019 measurements from the same survey participants and specimens. For quantitative analytes, measurement accuracy is assessed using standard method comparison procedures, precision is evaluated by comparing to quality control standards, and reproducibility is estimated by treating data like an incurred sample reanalysis. Qualitative measures are analyzed using concordance measures and exact binomial tests.
resultsObserved proportional differences are 3%-12% for cotinine in people who do not smoke, 11% for cotinine in people who smoke, -8% to 1% for vitamin A, 8%-9% for vitamin E, and -6% to 8% for MMA. Precision estimates are within the standards established by quality control data and generally applicable quality goals. Differences between measurements are within 20% of the average value for at least 85% of all samples. For qualitative HCV-RNA and MMA results, we observe 99% concordance between measurements.
conclusionsMultipronged analysis showed that most differences are within acceptable ranges based on standard laboratory criteria for assessing accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. Results suggest future measurements and subsequent statistical analyses of stored serum specimens should be valid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.