Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083313›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Surrogacy in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring recruitment processes, eligibility criteria, stigma and postnatal care experiences among surrogate mothers.

Doris Ayeley Amarteifio, Rosemond Akpene Hiadzi, Peace Mamle Tetteh, Isaac Mensah Boafo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Doris Ayeley AmarteifioFamily Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Rosemond Akpene HiadziDepartment of Sociology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana rhiadzi@ug.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9376-877X
Peace Mamle TettehDepartment of Sociology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Isaac Mensah BoafoDepartment of Sociology, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurrogacy has become a vital reproductive option for individuals and couples who are unable to conceive naturally. This study explores the experiences of surrogate mothers in Ghana, focusing on recruitment pathways, eligibility criteria, societal stigma and postnatal care experiences.

designQualitative phenomenological research design was used, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic content analysis.

settingThree private agencies that source surrogate mothers for assisted reproduction facilities in Accra, Ghana. Data were collected between December 2020 and June 2021.

participantsTwenty-one surrogate mothers aged 20-40 years who were either pregnant (gestational age ≥16 weeks) or had delivered within the past 2 years were recruited from three private agencies in Accra.

resultsThematic analysis generated four themes: (1) recruitment pathways into surrogacy, (2) eligibility criteria and assessments, (3) experiences of stigma and concealment and (4) postnatal care and recovery. These themes illustrate how surrogate mothers in Ghana navigate recruitment processes, psychosocial and medical evaluations, societal stigma and challenges with discharge and follow-up care.

conclusionThese findings underscore the need for systemic changes, including enhanced postnatal care, structured psychological evaluations and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce stigma.

Indexed as

Gestational CarriersPostnatal CareSocial StigmaAdultFemaleGhanaHumansMothersPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung Adultbehaviordecision makingpublic healthreproductive medicinesocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID41083313
PMCPMC12519658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.