Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083264›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025

Relational dynamics inform predictive motor planning and perception.

Abdul-Rahim Deeb, Fulvio Domini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdul-Rahim DeebDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-5720-5317
Fulvio DominiDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States.

Funding

Encoding of probability distributions of 3D estimates in mind and brainR21EY033182 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID, DOMINI, FULVIO · 2022 to 2023
$439k
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1R21EY033182-01A1National Science Foundation (NSF) 2120610NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size and material appearance of objects affect how much force we use to pick them up. We can also infer physical properties from how objects move when they collide, so it seems plausible that such cues might also affect our actions. To test this, we developed a hybrid virtual-reality/real-object paradigm in which seven participants viewed VR movies of collisions between visually identical spheres that varied only in apparent mass ratios and coefficients of restitution, while co-located real spheres mirrored the virtual objects' final positions. After watching each movie, participants were asked to pick each object up, while we measured the forces they used to do so. Our findings show that indeed lift forces depend on objects' motion after impact. Interestingly, this also caused an illusion of perceived weight, much like the classic size-weight and material-weight illusions. These results show that motion cues alone can shape both how we plan to lift and how heavy we feel an object is.

Indexed as

IllusionsMotion PerceptionMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceWeight PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleVirtual RealityYoung Adultintuitive physicsperceptual representationpredictive motor controlsensorimotor planningweight illusion

Identifiers

PMID41083264
PMCPMC12582358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.