ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
From image to report: automating lung cancer screening interpretation and reporting with vision-language models.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential to improve early detection of lung cancer through expansion of focused and opportunistic screening approaches: a scoping review focusing on potential expansion of screening risk factors and adoption of artificial intelligence models.Lung cancer management · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of multimodal large language models in detecting pulp stones on panoramic radiographs.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Do Accuracy Gains Reflect Genuine Visual Understanding? A Multi-Model Evaluation of Vision-Language Models in Thoracic Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Biomedical multimodal large language models: From model-centric development to clinically grounded evaluation and integration.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- Visual Large Language Models in Radiology: A Systematic Multimodel Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Hallucinations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLung cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps identify lung cancer at an early stage and thus improves overall survival. The growing adoption of LDCT screening has increased radiologists' workload and demands specialized training to accurately interpret LDCT images and report findings. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs) and vision models, could help reduce this burden and improve accuracy.
methodsWe devised LUMEN (Lung cancer screening with Unified Multimodal Evaluation and Navigation), a multimodal AI framework that mimics the radiologist's workflow by identifying nodules in LDCT images, generating their characteristics, and drafting corresponding radiology reports in accordance with reporting guidelines. LUMEN integrates computer vision, vision-language models (VLMs), and LLMs. To assess our system, we developed a benchmarking framework to evaluate the lung cancer screening reports generated based on the findings and management criteria outlined in the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). It extracts them from radiology reports and measures clinical accuracy-focusing on information that is clinically important for lung cancer screening-independently of report format.
resultsThis complement exists LLM/VLM in semantic accuracy metrics and provides a more comprehensive view of system performance. Our lung cancer screening report generation system achieved unparalleled performance compared to contemporary VLM systems, including M3D CT2Report. Furthermore, compared to standard LLM metrics, the clinical metrics we designed for lung cancer screening more accurately reflect the clinical utility of the generated reports.
conclusionLUMEN demonstrates the feasibility of generating clinically accurate lung nodule reports from LDCT images through a nodule-centric VQA approach, highlighting the potential of integrating VLMs and LLMs to support radiologists in lung cancer screening workflows. Our findings also underscore the importance of applying clinically meaningful evaluation metrics in developing medical AI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.