Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41083099›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025

From image to report: automating lung cancer screening interpretation and reporting with vision-language models.

Tien-Yu Chang, Qinglin Gou, Leyi Zhao, Tiancheng Zhou, Hongyu Chen, Dong Yang, Huiwen Ju, Kaleb E Smith, Chengkun Sun, Jinqian Pan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tien-Yu ChangDepartment of BioHealth Informatics, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Qinglin GouDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1889 Museum Rd, Suite 7000, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Leyi ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
Tiancheng ZhouDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1889 Museum Rd, Suite 7000, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Hongyu ChenDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1889 Museum Rd, Suite 7000, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Dong YangNvidia, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA.
Huiwen JuNvidia, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA.
Kaleb E SmithNvidia, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA.
Chengkun SunDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1889 Museum Rd, Suite 7000, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Jinqian PanDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1889 Museum Rd, Suite 7000, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Yu HuangDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, HITS 3000, BSAT, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Regenstreif Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, IN 46202, USA.
Xing HeDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, HITS 3000, BSAT, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Regenstreif Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, IN 46202, USA.
Xuhong ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408, USA.
Daguang XuNvidia, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA.
Jie XuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1889 Museum Rd, Suite 7000, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Jiang BianDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, HITS 3000, BSAT, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Regenstreif Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, IN 46202, USA.
Aokun ChenInstitute on Digital Health and Innovation, College of nursing, Florida State University, FL 32310, USA.

Funding

Advancing Precision Lung Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes in Diverse Populations (PLuS2)R01CA284646 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Dejana K Braithwaite, Michael K Gould · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
The benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in FloridaR01CA246418 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246418NCI NIH HHS R01 CA284646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLung cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps identify lung cancer at an early stage and thus improves overall survival. The growing adoption of LDCT screening has increased radiologists' workload and demands specialized training to accurately interpret LDCT images and report findings. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs) and vision models, could help reduce this burden and improve accuracy.

methodsWe devised LUMEN (Lung cancer screening with Unified Multimodal Evaluation and Navigation), a multimodal AI framework that mimics the radiologist's workflow by identifying nodules in LDCT images, generating their characteristics, and drafting corresponding radiology reports in accordance with reporting guidelines. LUMEN integrates computer vision, vision-language models (VLMs), and LLMs. To assess our system, we developed a benchmarking framework to evaluate the lung cancer screening reports generated based on the findings and management criteria outlined in the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). It extracts them from radiology reports and measures clinical accuracy-focusing on information that is clinically important for lung cancer screening-independently of report format.

resultsThis complement exists LLM/VLM in semantic accuracy metrics and provides a more comprehensive view of system performance. Our lung cancer screening report generation system achieved unparalleled performance compared to contemporary VLM systems, including M3D CT2Report. Furthermore, compared to standard LLM metrics, the clinical metrics we designed for lung cancer screening more accurately reflect the clinical utility of the generated reports.

conclusionLUMEN demonstrates the feasibility of generating clinically accurate lung nodule reports from LDCT images through a nodule-centric VQA approach, highlighting the potential of integrating VLMs and LLMs to support radiologists in lung cancer screening workflows. Our findings also underscore the importance of applying clinically meaningful evaluation metrics in developing medical AI systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41083099
PMCPMC12579329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.