SynthesisThe Journal of nutrition2025
Probiotics in Term Infants: Clinical Impact of Infant-Type Bifidobacteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.
Synthesis in The Journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of probiotics in preventing atopic dermatitis in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal Prenatal Diet and Colic and Eczema Among Infants.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Current Understanding of Probiotic Strains and Immune Function: From Gut Microbiota to Systemic Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics labeled "infant-type bifidobacteria" (ITB), such as the B. longum subsp. infantis strains, have gained significant attention in recent years for their potential to positively influence the gut microbiome, early immune system development, and consequently future health. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the actual clinical impact, the optimal strains, dosing regimens, and treatment duration-both in general and for ITB-probiotics specifically. This systematic review evaluates the clinical effects of administering ITB-probiotics to healthy, term infants within the first year of life. The aim was to address all categories of clinical outcomes. However, the included studies focused primarily on antibiotic use, atopic conditions, gastrointestinal health, and growth. We systematically and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus, followed by a meta-analysis where applicable. A total of 25 studies were included and assessed for risk of bias using the revised Cochrane tool (RoB 2). We found that early administration of ITB-probiotics was associated with a significant reduction in eczema [risk ratio (RR) = 0.78 (0.68, 0.90)] and a borderline significant reduction in respiratory tract infections [RR = 0.74 (0.54, 1.00)]. Other commonly reported outcomes, including antibiotic use, diarrhea, asthmatic bronchitis, and food allergy, also showed trends toward a preventive effect, though these findings did not reach statistical significance. This review underscores the potential clinical relevance of ITB-probiotics, particularly in the prevention of eczema and respiratory tract infections. However, the evidence is limited by study heterogeneity and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and standardized outcome measures are needed to clarify both short- and long-term effects of ITB probiotic administration in neonates and infants. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42024507608.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.