Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082980›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of nutrition2025

Probiotics in Term Infants: Clinical Impact of Infant-Type Bifidobacteria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

Mathias A Sjælland, Marie T Philipsen, Tine B Henriksen, Josephine Skipper, Sune Rubak

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathias A SjællandDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: mathiv@rm.dk.
Marie T PhilipsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tine B HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Josephine SkipperDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sune RubakDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics labeled "infant-type bifidobacteria" (ITB), such as the B. longum subsp. infantis strains, have gained significant attention in recent years for their potential to positively influence the gut microbiome, early immune system development, and consequently future health. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the actual clinical impact, the optimal strains, dosing regimens, and treatment duration-both in general and for ITB-probiotics specifically. This systematic review evaluates the clinical effects of administering ITB-probiotics to healthy, term infants within the first year of life. The aim was to address all categories of clinical outcomes. However, the included studies focused primarily on antibiotic use, atopic conditions, gastrointestinal health, and growth. We systematically and comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus, followed by a meta-analysis where applicable. A total of 25 studies were included and assessed for risk of bias using the revised Cochrane tool (RoB 2). We found that early administration of ITB-probiotics was associated with a significant reduction in eczema [risk ratio (RR) = 0.78 (0.68, 0.90)] and a borderline significant reduction in respiratory tract infections [RR = 0.74 (0.54, 1.00)]. Other commonly reported outcomes, including antibiotic use, diarrhea, asthmatic bronchitis, and food allergy, also showed trends toward a preventive effect, though these findings did not reach statistical significance. This review underscores the potential clinical relevance of ITB-probiotics, particularly in the prevention of eczema and respiratory tract infections. However, the evidence is limited by study heterogeneity and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and standardized outcome measures are needed to clarify both short- and long-term effects of ITB probiotic administration in neonates and infants. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42024507608.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumProbioticsEczemaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRespiratory Tract InfectionsBifidobacteriachild healthgut microbiotaimmune systemprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41082980
PMCPMC12799449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.