Trial reportEndoscopy2026
A rural-to-center artificial intelligence model for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection and premalignant gastric conditions using endoscopy images captured in routine practice.
Trial report in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Premalignant Lesions.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026Review
- From screening to surveillance: integrated prevention ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Screening for Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Family Medicine and Geriatric and Gerontology Care: Protocol for a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- EGID: A Comprehensive Multi-label Endoscopic Image Dataset for Gastritis Classification.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis of Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Early Gastric Cancer: From Basics to Advanced Imaging.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastric cancer research: a bibliometric and visualized analysis from 1993 to 2026.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in advanced endoscopic imaging: transforming optical diagnosis in gastroenterology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection and premalignant gastric conditions typically requires 13C urea breath testing or histological assessment, which are often unavailable in remote areas. A rural-to-center artificial intelligence (AI) model was developed and implemented to automatically evaluate upper endoscopy images from routine clinical practice. Methods: Endoscopic images were collected from a rural hospital on Matsu Islands and a tertiary center across Taiwan Strait. During model development (2020–2022), AI algorithms were trained, validated, and tested to exclude low-quality and non-gastric images, segment gastric regions, and enhance mucosal features for detecting H. pylori infection and premalignant conditions. During model implementation (2023–2024), endoscopic images from a rural hospital were transmitted to the medical center for AI analyses, with results promptly returned. Results: In the development phase, diagnostic accuracies were 92.8% (95%CI 88.9%–96.6%) for H. pylori, 88.6% (95%CI 87.2%–90.0%) for atrophic gastritis, and 88.0% (95%CI 86.5%–89.5%) for intestinal metaplasia. In the implementation phase, 3518 rural residents underwent 13C urea breath testing or pepsinogen testing; 421 with positive results underwent endoscopy. No significant differences were observed between AI-predicted and clinically observed prevalence: H. pylori (13.9% vs. 12.9%; P = 0.55), atrophic gastritis (15.7% vs. 11.9%; P = 0.34), and intestinal metaplasia (27.6% vs. 22.4%; P = 0.32). Implementation-phase diagnostic accuracies were 91.3% (95%CI 88.0%–94.6%), 79.9% (95%CI 72.1%–86.3%), and 63.4% (95%CI 54.7%–71.6%), respectively. Conclusions: AI enabled physicians in resource-limited settings to rapidly assess gastric health using routinely captured endoscopic images, bridging gaps in access and expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.