Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082919›Full record

Trial reportEndoscopy2026

A rural-to-center artificial intelligence model for diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection and premalignant gastric conditions using endoscopy images captured in routine practice.

Tsung-Hsien Chiang, Yen-Ning Hsu, Min-Han Chen, Yi-Ru Chen, Hsiu-Chi Cheng, Mei-Jin Chen, Fu-Jen Lee, Chi-Yang Chang, Chun-Chao Chang, Ming-Jong Bair and 13 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Premalignant Lesions.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
  2. From screening to surveillance: integrated prevention ofThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Tsung-Hsien ChiangDepartment of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yen-Ning HsuCenter of Intelligent Healthcare, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Min-Han ChenCenter of Intelligent Healthcare, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yi-Ru ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Chi ChengDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Mei-Jin ChenNangan Township, Bureau of Public Health, Matsu Islands, Lienchiang County, Taiwan.
Fu-Jen LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chi-Yang ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chun-Chao ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ming-Jong BairDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taitung Mackey Memorial Hospital, Taitung, Taiwan.
Jyh-Ming LiouDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chiuan-Jung ChenInformation Technology Office, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yen-Chung ChenDepartment of Pathology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hospital, Yilan City, Taiwan.
Hung ChiangTaipei Institute of Pathology, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chia-Tung ShunDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jui-Hsuan LiuLienchiang County Hospital, Nangan Township, Lienchiang County, Matsu Islands, Taiwan, Matsu Islands, Taiwan.
Han-Mo ChiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ming-Shiang WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jiun-Yu YuDepartment and Graduate Institute of Business Administration, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Ruey-Shan GuoDepartment and Graduate Institute of Business Administration, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jaw-Town LinDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Yi-Chia Lee *Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-1216
Chu-Song Chen *Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 111-2314-B-002-136-MY3 and 114-2314-B-002-245-MY3National Taiwan University Hospital 114-E0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection and premalignant gastric conditions typically requires 13C urea breath testing or histological assessment, which are often unavailable in remote areas. A rural-to-center artificial intelligence (AI) model was developed and implemented to automatically evaluate upper endoscopy images from routine clinical practice. Methods: Endoscopic images were collected from a rural hospital on Matsu Islands and a tertiary center across Taiwan Strait. During model development (2020–2022), AI algorithms were trained, validated, and tested to exclude low-quality and non-gastric images, segment gastric regions, and enhance mucosal features for detecting H. pylori infection and premalignant conditions. During model implementation (2023–2024), endoscopic images from a rural hospital were transmitted to the medical center for AI analyses, with results promptly returned. Results: In the development phase, diagnostic accuracies were 92.8% (95%CI 88.9%–96.6%) for H. pylori, 88.6% (95%CI 87.2%–90.0%) for atrophic gastritis, and 88.0% (95%CI 86.5%–89.5%) for intestinal metaplasia. In the implementation phase, 3518 rural residents underwent 13C urea breath testing or pepsinogen testing; 421 with positive results underwent endoscopy. No significant differences were observed between AI-predicted and clinically observed prevalence: H. pylori (13.9% vs. 12.9%; P = 0.55), atrophic gastritis (15.7% vs. 11.9%; P = 0.34), and intestinal metaplasia (27.6% vs. 22.4%; P = 0.32). Implementation-phase diagnostic accuracies were 91.3% (95%CI 88.0%–94.6%), 79.9% (95%CI 72.1%–86.3%), and 63.4% (95%CI 54.7%–71.6%), respectively. Conclusions: AI enabled physicians in resource-limited settings to rapidly assess gastric health using routinely captured endoscopic images, bridging gaps in access and expertise.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGastritis, AtrophicGastroscopyHelicobacter InfectionsPrecancerous ConditionsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedBreath TestsFemaleGastric MucosaHelicobacter pyloriHospitals, RuralHumansMaleMetaplasia

Identifiers

PMID41082919
PMCPMC13063403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.