Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082655›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Smartphone use in a large US adult population: Temporal associations between objective measures of usage and mental well-being.

Ari Winbush, Daniel McDuff, John Hernandez, Andrew Barakat, Allen Jiang, Conor Heneghan, Benjamin W Nelson, Nicholas B Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adolescents' daily affect predicts their mobile phone use (not the other way around).Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smartphone use in a large US adult population: Temporal associations between objective measures of usage and mental well-being.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ari WinbushDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
Daniel McDuffGoogle Research, Seattle, WA 98109.
John HernandezGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA 94043.ORCID 0000-0002-3313-430X
Andrew BarakatGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA 94043.
Allen JiangGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA 94043.ORCID 0000-0003-2809-0469
Conor HeneghanGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA 94043.ORCID 0000-0002-4147-1349
Benjamin W NelsonVerily Life Sciences, Dallas, TX 75019.ORCID 0000-0002-5474-7674
Nicholas B AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-6639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphones are essential tools in daily life yet concerns persist about their potential effects on mental health and well-being. Research on these relationships often relies on subjective measures of smartphone use, which can lack validity. These studies are also often limited by small, homogenous samples and the inability to differentiate between types of smartphone activities (e.g., social media vs. other applications). In this study, we analyzed 250,000 d of smartphone usage data from 10,099 adults, using objective measures of smartphone usage collected over 4 wk. We examined normative usage patterns and the temporal relationships between smartphone use and mood. Our findings reveal weak or null associations between smartphone use and mood, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally, and at both individual and group levels. Demographic factors, such as age and gender, were stronger predictors of mood than smartphone use. Statistically significant results that were observed showed that younger adults demonstrated a stronger association between social media use and lower mood cross-sectionally, but not longitudinally. Non-social app use was linked to lower mood in between-subjects analyses, but better mood in within-subjects analyses. However, all effects were small (or null), indicating minimal practical significance. These findings suggest that smartphone use has a limited or negligible impact on mood and well-being over a 4-wk period and do not support claims of a strong or causal relationship between smartphone use and mental well-being across this timeframe.

Indexed as

AffectMental HealthSmartphoneAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSocial MediaUnited StatesYoung Adultmental healthmobile sensingsmartphoneswellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41082655
PMCPMC12582163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.