ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2025
Evaluating short-chain fatty acids in breath condensate as surrogate measurements for systemic levels and investigation into alternative respiratory sample matrices.
Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are metabolic by-products from microbial fermentation of complex carbohydrates and protein. They have gained clinical interest for their protective effects, including within the lung microenvironment. SCFAs are detectable in circulation and exhaled breath condensate (EBC), posing questions as to whether exhaled SCFAs originate from the gut and/or lung microbiota. Mapping SCFAs from the lung could improve our understanding of microbial activity in respiratory conditions. SCFA measurements in EBC were evaluated using a validated gas chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. Six healthy participants ingested sodium acetate, calcium propionate and sodium butyrate to acutely increase circulating SCFAs. EBC samples were collected alongside venous draws, with circulating and exhaled levels compared. A series of additional respiratory sample matrices from patient samples was investigated to gain novel insights into SCFAs within different respiratory biofluids. Serum SCFAs were increased in line with known responses. However, these increases were not observed in EBC, indicating a lack of correlation between circulating and exhaled SCFAs. SCFAs were detected in all additional respiratory biosamples, with EBC and sputum reporting the highest concentrations. Interestingly, branched-chain moieties were notably abundant in sputum, indicating the potential for their local production by bacterial fermentation of lung mucus proteins. SCFAs in EBC do not reflect circulatory levels and, therefore, are not a suitable surrogate measurement to inform on systemic load. These data suggest that exhaled SCFAs are potentially derived from lung microbial metabolism, supporting the need for further investigation into SCFA production, function and diagnostic utility in respiratory health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.