Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082581›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Understanding the mechanism of facilitation in hoverfly TSDNs.

Anindya Ghosh, Sarah Nicholas, Karin Nordström, Thomas Nowotny, James Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anindya GhoshSussex AI, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-8735
Sarah NicholasFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-9421
Karin NordströmFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-6348
Thomas NowotnySussex AI, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
James KnightSussex AI, School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0577-0074

Funding

US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (FA9550-23-1-0473)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals use visual motion cues to track and pursue small, fast-moving targets, such as prey or conspecifics. In target-pursuing insects, including dragonflies and hoverflies, Small Target Motion Detector (STMD) neurons are found in the optic lobes and are believed to be presynaptic to Target Selective Descending Neurons (TSDNs) that project to motor command centres. While STMDs respond robustly to target motion - even when displayed against moving backgrounds - TSDN target responses are modulated by background motion. Depending on whether the background motion is syn- or contra-directional to the target motion, the response of the TSDNs is either suppressed or facilitated (amplified). This suggests that TSDNs not only receive input from STMDs but also from neurons sensitive to background motion, but this neural circuit is not clearly understood. To explore the underlying neural mechanisms, we developed three candidate TSDN circuit models - which combine input from bio-plausible STMDs and optic flow-sensitive Lobula Plate Tangential Cells (LPTCs) in different ways - and fitted them to published electrophysiology data from hoverfly TSDNs. We then tested the best-fitting models against new electrophysiological data using different background patterns. We found that the overall best model suggests simple inhibition from LPTCs with the same preferred direction as the STMDs feeding into the TSDN. This parsimonious mechanism can explain the facilitation and suppression of TSDN responses to small targets, and may inform similar studies in other animals.

Indexed as

DipteraNeuronsAnimalsComputer SimulationElectrophysiologyMaleNeural PathwaysOptic Lobe, Nonmammalian

Identifiers

PMID41082581
PMCPMC12539733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.