ArticlePloS one2025
Microplastic contaminants potentially distort our understanding of the ocean's carbon cycle.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct observations confirm that admixtures of sedimentary organic matter (SOM) and microplastics (MPs) are fully oxidized during Elemental analysis (EA), with measured carbon yields, % carbon [%C], C:N ratios, stable- (δ13C) and radiocarbon (Δ14C) abundances consistent with predictions for SOM samples intentionally contaminated with plastic. As an example, MPs would comprise ~40% of all carbon atoms measured via EA in a 100 μg SOM sample (1% OC by mass) that has been contaminated with only 1 μg of polyethylene (PE = 77% C by mass). This MP contamination, amounting to just 1% of the total sample mass, would lower the sample's Δ14C by 258‰ to -622 ‰, lower the sample's δ13C by -3.65‰ to -25.22‰, and overestimate its conventional 14C age by ~4000 years. Moreover, this 1% MP contamination would imply a terrestrial source contribution of ~ 60% instead of the 20% for an uncontaminated SOM sample. Our results illustrate how these errors scale predictably with MP contamination level and dominant polymer types. While large errors might be recognized as outliers and scrutinized, even small levels of contamination (e.g., 0.1% by mass) can introduce significant but subtle errors that could go unnoticed (e.g., Δ¹⁴C error of -30‰). Most carbon biogeochemistry studies do not routinely recognize the presence of MPs in environmental samples, despite the ubiquity of MP in the ocean and their potential impact on measurements. Consequently, MP contamination either naturally-occurring in field samples or introduced while sampling and processing will necessarily lead to errors in organic matter characterization, source apportionment, and estimates of conventional 14C ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.