Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082527›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Hippocampal pyramidal cells of the CA1 region are not a major target of the thalamic nucleus reuniens.

Lilya Andrianova, Paul J Banks, Clair A Booth, Erica S Brady, Gabriella Margetts-Smith, Shivali Kohli, Jonathan Cavanagh, Zafar I Bashir, Chris J McBain, Michael T Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lilya AndrianovaSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-3782
Paul J BanksSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Clair A BoothSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Erica S BradyInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3589-9645
Gabriella Margetts-SmithInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1885-2661
Shivali KohliInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2556-0552
Jonathan CavanaghSchool of Infection & Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-8050
Zafar I BashirSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Chris J McBainProgram in Developmental Neurobiology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-0157
Michael T CraigSchool of Psychology & Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-6709

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prefrontal-hippocampal-entorhinal system is perhaps the most widely-studied circuit in cognitive and systems neuroscience, due to its role in supporting cognitive functions such as working memory and decision-making. Disrupted communication within this circuit is a key feature of disorders such as schizophrenia and dementia. Nucleus reuniens (NRe) is a midline thalamic nucleus that sits at the nexus of this circuit, linking these regions together. As there are no direct projections from prefrontal cortex to hippocampus (HPC), the accepted model is that the NRe mediates prefrontal drive of hippocampal activity, although these connections are poorly defined at the cellular and synaptic level. Using ex vivo optogenetics and electrophysiology in both mice and rats, alongside monosynaptic circuit-tracing, we sought to test the mechanisms through which NRe could drive hippocampal activity. Unexpectedly, we found no evidence that pyramidal cells in CA1 receive input from NRe, with midline thalamic input to HPC proper appearing selective for GABAergic interneurons. In other regions targeted by NRe, we found that pyramidal cells in prosubiculum and subiculum received synaptic inputs from NRe that were at least an order of magnitude weaker than those in prefrontal or entorhinal cortices. We conclude that, contrary to widely-held assumptions in the field, hippocampal pyramidal cells are not a major target of NRe.

Indexed as

CA1 Region, HippocampalMidline Thalamic NucleiPyramidal CellsAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeural PathwaysPrefrontal CortexRats

Identifiers

PMID41082527
PMCPMC12530533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.