ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2025
Frailty Assessment in an Aging Mouse Model.
Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A frailty index (FI) is a powerful method of assessing animal models of aging, serving as a proxy measure of biologic age and health span. Frailty represents a state of increased vulnerability to adverse outcomes due to the accumulation of health deficits that limit independence. The concept is valuable for animal studies that inform human geroscience. For example, using FI scores, animals with a similar chronological age can be differentiated by their biological age. Thus, FI can be used in preclinical studies to measure biological age, track frailty longitudinally, and assess health span. A murine frailty index was recently developed using 31 health-related deficits. However, its length and requirement for specialized equipment pose limitations in practical use. Here, we present an adapted 16 item frailty index that excludes parameters requiring special instrumentation or invasive testing. The selected deficits are easily observable or measurable and evaluate integument, musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, sensory, urogenital, and respiratory systems. Body weight is measured for longitudinal tracking but excluded from the FI calculation. Each deficit is scored as 0, 0.5, or 1, based on severity, with the FI computed as the mean of the 16 deficit scores. This streamlined FI allows rapid assessment of large cohorts, can be applied longitudinally to the same animals, and requires no specialized equipment. We demonstrate its feasibility in C57BL/6×129 mice, showing age-associated increases in frailty, variation among individual mice, and the ability to detect deficits across multiple systems. This tool enables laboratories to incorporate frailty into diverse experimental designs, provides a practical approach for assessing health span, and enhances translational relevance in geroscience. This frailty index is adapted from previously validated mouse clinical frailty methodologies and is intended for straightforward, longitudinal use alongside ongoing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.