ArticlePloS one2025
A modulation format recognition and optical signal-to-noise ratio monitoring scheme based on residual network and Taylor score pruning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating practical methods for real-time monitoring of modulation formats (MF) and optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) in coherent optical communication systems is critical for advancing future dynamic and heterogeneous optical networks. In this work, we propose a residual network with an attention mechanism(SA-ResNet) to perform joint monitoring of MF and OSNR for mainstream quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM) signals, including 8QAM, 16QAM, 32QAM, 64QAM, and 128QAM. After applying Taylor pruning to the model, its floating-point operations (FLOPs) were reduced from 40.5 M to 9.5 M, and its parameter memory was decreased from 2.6 M to 0.5 M. Notably, following fine-tuning, the model still achieved 100% MF recognition accuracy and an average absolute error of 0.34 dB for OSNR estimation under a sample length of 16,000 and fiber length of 160 km. When the model is evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, the average MF recognition accuracy is 99.988%, and the mean of average absolute errors for OSNR estimation is 0.32 dB. These results indicate that the proposed model has acceptable monitoring performance and requires relatively low computational resources, which makes it attractive for lightweight application scenarios of optical fiber monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.