Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082278›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2025

Gestural and Verbal Evidence of Conceptual Representation Differences in Blind and Sighted Individuals.

Ezgi Mamus, Laura J Speed, Gerardo Ortega, Asifa Majid, Aslı Özyürek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ezgi MamusCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-8653
Laura J SpeedCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University.ORCID 0000-0002-3147-3615
Gerardo OrtegaDepartment of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0001-5305-1467
Asifa MajidDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0003-0132-216X
Aslı ÖzyürekMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This preregistered study examined whether visual experience influences conceptual representations by examining both gestural expression and feature listing. Gestures-mostly driven by analog mappings of visuospatial and motoric experiences onto the body-offer a unique window into conceptual representations and provide complementary information not offered by language-based features, which have been the focus of previous work. Thirty congenitally or early blind and 30 sighted Turkish speakers produced silent gestures and features for concepts from semantic categories that differentially rely on experience in visual (non-manipulable objects and animals) and motor (manipulable objects) information. Blind individuals were less likely than sighted individuals to produce gestures for non-manipulable objects and animals, but not for manipulable objects. Overall, the tendency to use a particular gesture strategy for specific semantic categories was similar across groups. However, blind participants relied less on drawing and personification strategies depicting visuospatial aspects of concepts than sighted participants. Feature-listing revealed that blind participants share considerable conceptual knowledge with sighted participants, but their understanding differs in fine-grained details, particularly for animals. Thus, while concepts appear broadly similar in blind and sighted individuals, this study reveals nuanced differences, too, highlighting the intricate role of visual experience in conceptual representations.

Indexed as

BlindnessConcept FormationGesturesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSemanticsYoung AdultAnimalsBlindnessFeature listingManipulable objectsNon‐manipulable objectsSilent gesture

Identifiers

PMID41082278
PMCPMC12517398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.