Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41082222›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2025

Sedation vs General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SEGA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Peng Roc Chen, Carlos A Artime, Sunil A Sheth, Claudia Pedroza, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Stacey Wolfe, Clark Sitton, Peter Kan, Omar Tanweer, Alex Chebl and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03263117 (SEGA - SEdation Versus General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke - a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03263117 phase4completednot on this map

SEGA - SEdation Versus General Anesthesia for Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke - a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2018 to 2023Enrolled260ConditionsStrokeArmsSedation, General Anesthesia (GA), Intra-arterial Thrombectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Revascularization treatments within 4.5 h after onset in acute ischemic stroke with isolated extracranial artery occlusion.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Peng Roc ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Carlos A ArtimeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Sunil A ShethDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Claudia PedrozaInstitute for Clinical Research and Learning Health Care, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Santiago Ortega-GutierrezDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health, Iowa City.
Stacey WolfeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Clark SittonDepartment of Radiology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Peter KanRobert L. Moody Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston.
Omar TanweerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Alex CheblDepartment of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.
Clemens M SchirmerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Geisinger and Geisinger College of Health Sciences, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.
Jay T MorrowRochester Regional Health Neuroscience Institute, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, New York.
Yazan J AlderaziNeuroscience Service Line, Gulf Coast Division, HCA Houston Healthcare, Houston, Texas.
Bradley BohnstedtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis.
Kadir ErkmenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Edgar A SamaniegoDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health, Iowa City.
Elena GarridoDepartment of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Radiology, The University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health, Iowa City.
Sean I SavitzInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Allison EngstromThe University of California, Irvine.
Eddie AguilarDepartment of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Tien NguyenDepartment of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
Andrew D BarretoDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.
SEGA Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The optimal anesthetic strategy for patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unclear. Objective: To determine if general anesthesia (GA) or moderate sedation for patients who undergo EVT for AIS with LVO is associated with a different functional outcome in 90 days. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from July 2018 to August 2023 of patients with AIS who were receiving EVT due to LVO. Patients were recruited from 10 comprehensive stroke centers in the US. Adult patients with occlusion of the carotid artery and the proximal middle and anterior cerebral artery who underwent EVT were eligible for enrollment. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either moderate sedation or GA in 1:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Results: A total of 1931 patients were screened for eligibility, and 1671 were excluded due to failure meeting the inclusion criteria. Among 260 individuals with a mean (SD) age of 66.8 (13.3) years included in this intention-to-treat study, 133 were male (52%), and 130 (50%) were randomized to GA and sedation each. At 90 days, a shift in the distribution of ordinal mRS was found favoring GA (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.79-1.87) with an 81% posterior probability of GA superiority. The probability that GA was superior to sedation was 89% (relative risk [RR], 1.2; 95% CrI, 0.9-1.66) and 69% (RR, 1.01; 95% CrI, 0.96-1.08) for 90-day mRS 0 to 2 and successful reperfusion, respectively. Other secondary outcomes were similar. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was 0.8% (1 of 125 patients) in GA vs 2.4% (3 of 125 patients) in sedation with a posterior probability of GA was superior to sedation of 72% (RR, 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.23-2.16). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that patients with LVO AIS who were treated with EVT using GA had improved rates of 90-day outcomes and higher rates of successful reperfusion compared with those treated using moderate sedation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263117.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeProcedural SedationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41082222
PMCPMC12687099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.